Monday, November 28, 2011

Quitting DC Comics



A question anyone who reads comic books well into adulthood is almost certain to encounter at some point is, "Why do you still read comic books?"

It's not really an easy question to answer. Entertainment, obviously, although that's been a matter of diminishing returns for a while now. Habit, too, I guess. I mean, it's hard to quit something you've been doing literally your entire life. One of my earliest childhood memories is sitting on my mom's lap as she used this to help teach me how to read.

But really, what it comes down to most is that I care about the characters.

I think that's true for most of the people who read comics. Certainly, I prefer to think that we're not reading just for rehashed fight scenes and often lame dialogue. It's to the credit to a lot of talented writers and artists over the years that they managed to take a truly absurd concept like superheroes and somehow create and maintain three-dimensional characters who, once a week, thousands of people across the country make the trek to their local comic book store to keep up with.

But as I was reading the DC relaunch books, I came to an unfortunate realization. These aren't my characters anymore. Some have gotten facelifts that are mostly cosmetic. Some have been completely reimagined. But regardless, across the board, it felt like I was reading the beginning of an entirely new comic book universe. And that's just not something I'm interested in doing. So I'm stopping. I'm no longer reading DC Comics. Even the titles I initially said I was going to keep up with. I got halfway through what was going to be a four week review of all the relaunch books, when I discovered I simply didn't give a damn. Aside from picking up the new The Unwritten and Morning Glories TPBs a couple of weeks ago, I haven't been in a comic book store in weeks. Honestly, it doesn't feel all that bad. If nothing else, I now have a lot more money for beer and cigars.

Just to be clear, this isn't me going all angry fanboy. Even if I don't agree with DC's decision, I understand the need for it. The comic book industry has been shedding readers for years. This relaunch was a calculated risk to pick up new customers, and no business can do that without alienating old ones. I just happen to fall into that latter category. That's okay. A lot of people seem to dig the new direction of the company. Good. I don't want to live in a world without comics featuring Superman, Batman and Wonder Woman. I just won't be following along any longer.

I'm also not completely turning my back on DC. They publish an awful lot of stuff I read through Vertigo. I'll still be buying Hitman TPBs and undoubtedly a lot more back catalogue stuff down the road. And honestly, I know myself well enough to know that I'll probably cave from time to time when it comes to the new DCU stuff. It's not like you can just flip a switch and no longer dig Batman, you know?

I quit reading DC once before when I was a teenager. It was 1993 or 1994 and almost everything the company was putting out was absolutely wretched. Then, a few years later, I was in a Target in Ohio of all places, and on a whim, I picked up one of those five-issue packs of comics that you used to be able to buy at places like Target or Toys R Us. They were five issues of Mark Waid's legendary run on The Flash. I poured through them, and was like, "Whoa! I didn't even know comics could be this awesome." So I started reading them again.

Maybe something like that will happen down the road and I'll once more become a fan. Stranger things have happened. But for now, I'm done.

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

Paranormal Activity 3



I wasn't going to see Paranormal Activity 3. I am, at best, a lukewarm fan of the franchise. And I thought the gimmick was already old by the first sequel. And I hate prequels. And I just wasn't in the mood to see a movie. And if I were going to see a movie last weekend, it probably would have been that Justin Timberlake movie where no one gets old and Olivia Wilde plays his mom, and wouldn't that be all kinds of weird, being in your 20s and having Olivia Wilde as your mom? At that point, isn't incest--or at least the thought of incest--a little understandable? I hope they address this situation in the movie.

But I digress. I wasn't going to see the movie, but then my electricity went out on Sunday morning, and by the time the early football games started, it didn't show any signs of coming back on. I didn't feel like going to the bar to watch the Redskins game, so I figured, what the hell, and went to the movie theater without even bothering to check the listings. When I got there, the next showing of In Time was in an hour. The next showing of Paranormal Activity 3 was in five minutes. So.

Spoilers follow...

I can't think of a film franchise that I care less about the mythology behind it than Paranormal Activity. I'm fine with the information that was provided/hinted at in the first two films as to why these two sisters seem to have such bad luck with houses and video cameras. But evidently, this is a story that needed to be told.

I love movies about haunted houses, because they're the only horror films that manage to unnerve me somewhat. I know I don't have to worry about vampires, zombies, hillbilly cannibals, or whatever. But ghosts? Who knows? Seems plausible. So to the extent I enjoy the Paranormal Activity films, it's because they're really good at producing spine-tingling moments like strange noises coming from seemingly empty rooms, or quick glimpses of shadowy figures, or little kids conversing with something we can't see.

The problem is, that's really all the Paranormal Activity films have going for them. Plotwise, there's very little that's interesting. And the logic of the entire franchise is dependent on the idea that someone's first impulse upon hearing a bloodcurdling scream or a loud crash, is to grab a video camera and start filming. I'm not going to defend Blair Witch 2 as a good movie, but at least the filmmakers were smart enough to abandon the first person POV rather than shoehorn it into a plot. I think I would have enjoyed Paranormal Activity 2 and 3 considerably more if they'd been built around the story of the first one, as opposed to its gimmick.

As for the big revelation at the end that the grandmother was part of a coven of witches who wanted to impregnate them or marry them to Toby the ghost or something...I guess it's creepy and all, but A) It was telegraphed horribly, from the moment the plot element was introduced in that book that conveniently turned up, B) Katie and Kristi seem a bit young for childbearing, so I'm not sure why the witches even wanted them, and C) It felt a bit like a ripoff of the ending of The Last Exorcism.

I have no doubt that this time next year, Paranormal Activity 4 will be in theaters. The second film ended with a cliffhanger, so hopefully they'll get around to resolving that instead of filling in plot holes no one cared about in the first place.

Script: C
Acting:
B-
Gore:
D-
Overall:
C